The Efficacy of Rational Emotive
Therapy: A Quantitative Review of the Outcome
Research. Abstract
The results from a meta-analysis of 70
Rational Emotive Therapy (RET) outcome studies were
reported. There were 236 comparisons of RET to baseline,
control groups, Cognitive Behavior Modification, Behavior
Therapy, or other psychotherapies were examined.
Contrary to other reviews using the
narrative review method, RET was found to be an effective
form of therapy. However, this conclusion was tempered by
methodological flaws of the studies reviewed, such as lack
of follow-up data and information regarding attrition
rates.
Next
Previous
First Page
Method
Results
Discussion
References
Appendix
The results indicated that subjects receiving RET
demonstrated significant improvement over baseline measures
and control groups. The results showed no significant
differences in effect size between those studies which used
psychotherapy clients or students as subjects. Effect size
was significantly related to therapist experience and to
duration of the therapy. The results indicated that those
comparisons which were rated high in internal validity had
signficantly higher effect sizes than medium validity
studies. Outcome measures rated as low in reactivity had
significantly higher effect sizes than more reactive
measures.